Welcome to THG Asks, a feature in which our two celebrity gossip
experts debate a topical issue in the entertainment world and readers
decide on which side they fall.
Today, we turn our focus not just to Kristen Stewart and her shocking affair with Rupert Sanders, but to her unusual decision to issue a public apology regarding her actions.
We ponder both arguments and then THG Asks: Should the actress have taken this step?
Today, we turn our focus not just to Kristen Stewart and her shocking affair with Rupert Sanders, but to her unusual decision to issue a public apology regarding her actions.
We ponder both arguments and then THG Asks: Should the actress have taken this step?
-------------------------------------------
NO. By Free Britney
Kristen Stewart owes the public one thing
and one thing only: the best performance she can give on screen. She's
an actress. She didn't cause any personal or emotional harm to a single
fan out there and, no offense, but if she did... that's your fault, not
hers.
Kristen owes Robert Pattinson an apology. She owes Liberty Ross,
the wife of Sanders, an apology. She owes the director's two kids an
apology. These were people actually affected by her lapse in judgment.
But what Stewart does in the privacy of her own home - or in the front seat of a car,
apparently - is between Stewart, the person she is doing it with and
those connected to either or both. When it comes someone such as
Kristen, who has clearly never craved fame, I choose to judge her solely
on her acting chops and don't expect her to meet any sort of ethical
standard in her personal life.
And I certainly don't need her to apologize to me when she fails to do so.
Posting Komentar